DIFFERENCES between Facebook Lite vs Facebook App  ▷ 2020 Guide

While it is true, the famous social network Facebook It is used by billions of users worldwide, especially through their mobile. But, unfortunately, many of them get performance glitches and errors from this app, especially people who handle Android devices.

It is because of that, Mark Zuckerberg and his team, decided to create and develop an application called “Facebook Lite”, Which is intended for emerging markets. In addition, it has also been implemented to provide a solution as for slow connections. Thus, an app that occupies less than 2 MB and it can offer several of the functions that the “normal” or standard Facebook application ensures.

But, faced with this dilemma between the two applications, users of the social network wonder about which is more optimal to use Well, in what aspects do they differ from one another in order to download and install the most suitable one on your Smartphone or Tablet. Indeed, we want to let you know the main differences between Facebook application “normal” and Facebook Lite, then.

Comparison: Main differences between Facebook Lite and “normal” Facebook and which one I should use on my mobile

In order to know which facebook app choose to use on your mobile and that it works perfectly, in this section we present a substantial comparison, with which you will achieve better differentiate Facebook Lite from Facebook normal”. Since, believe it or not, both present highly relevant dissimilarities. Thus, know the following:

differences between Facebook Lite and normal Facebook APP

Performance

In reference to this aspect, a completely remarkable dissimilarity can be located between both Facebook mobile applications. Given that, once you start using Facebook “normal”And Facebook Lite for a while, you may notice the great difference in the performance of each of them.

In this sense, it should be noted that the Facebook Lite app has abominable fluidity. Especially when doing “scroll”Or slide on the timeline of your account from this app. Which, is totally logical because the little space it occupies on the device and for this, it was to be expected.

Added to this, it can be seen that it also has little capacity to load messages in the timeline. In other words, Lite can load very few messages and because of this, when you want to see new messages, you must load them every two by three.

In this performance aspect, it should also be noted that, in terms of loading times, Lite is completely disadvantageous when compared to the normal app. Since, it is visualized that the loading times in the transitions of the app they are huge, regardless of whether it is to open a small image, to visit a friend’s profile or to enter a new page on the timeline.

In short, if you want to use an app that performs generally well, it is best that you install the “normal” FB application and put aside the idea of ​​making use of Facebook Lite. Since, the dissimilarities in performance are very notable.

the interface

the interface

After performance, the feature that makes the biggest difference between normal Facebook and Lite is the change in the interface. Which, in the Lite version is completely reduced and is much more minimalist.

In detail, we indicate that, at the top of the screen, the sections that show both apps they are totally different. Since, in reference to the normal application, it only shows the search bar in the blue bar. Now in the case of FB Lite it contains icons inserted in the blue bar and the search bar disappears, so now transforms into one more section with a magnifying glass icon.

Also, located on the initial page of the social network, you will also see that one app changes significantly from the other. Starting because the complete app shows the images that your friends share on the network, with a very visible and comfortable size. But, this changes in the Lite version that, reduces them so they take less time to load. Thus, if you want to see it in a larger size, you have to click on the content.

For its part, there are also differences in the icons to give “I like” Y “Comment”A publication. In view of the fact that the Facebook Lite version contains icons much more minimalist and suppress the text marking of the “likes” that a certain post got, as well as the number of comments.

In short, the rest of the FB Lite tabs have a more reduced appearance, with less colorful and more modest icons. Which, was designed in such a way because they assumed that the application would be used on small screens and so, they adapted it that way.

So, if you like to have a more detailed, comfortable and attractive experience on Facebook, it is recommended that you use the “normal” application. Since, the Lite app gives the feeling of being a more “dirty” and old platform.

App weight and download

App weight and download

Before downloading and installing any mobile app, which users mostly verify is the weight of the application. Since, this influences during the download process and also in the performance of the mobile, in case of presenting or not the indicated capacity.

Well, in the case of the complete Facebook mobile app, presents a total weight of 60 MB. Which is not an inconvenience or restriction for people who proceed to download it with WiFi or 4G, but if you have a slow connection, the most indicated is that do not install said application.

Now, as for the application of Facebook Lite, of course it has a lower weight and this is between 2 MB in total. So even if you have a very slow internet connection, this will not matter because in a matter of seconds you can enter your social network account through said app.

However, regarding the use of the mobile’s internal memory, the normal Facebook application throws a weight of 128 MB (without temporary or user data) and this increases when you register and run the platform, as it can increase up to 307 MB. Which, does not happen with Lite because it only occupies 4.56 MB in memory and when you register and do whatever you want within the app, the size only grows to 6 MB.

With this, you can understand that Lite is more advantageous for users who do not want to take up a lot of space on their terminal just by using Facebook. Bearing in mind that the difference in weight between the normal version and the Lite version is quite abysmal.

The functions

The functions

Facebook Lite, being a simpler and simplified application, of course adds fewer features than full FB app. Therefore, in this aspect, we also find a very relevant dissimilarity. In such a way, we highlight the functions that the Lite version guarantees to be more specific, which are:

  • Comments and habitual “likes” or “likes”.
  • Timeline of states.
  • Friend requests and suggestions tab.
  • Search section.
  • Notifications tab.
  • Integrated Facebook Messenger. Which contains text, stickers and the ability to send or share photos.
  • Profile page and managed pages.
  • Automatic video playback on WiFi network.

In this sense, the FB Lite integrates the most used functions in the social network and when adding Facebook Messenger, it presents good factor points. Whereby, it is not that it is an application lacking in functions or mechanisms of interest within Facebook.

But, if you choose to enjoy a more complete experience within the social network, the best thing is that you use the “normal” FB application because it totally wins when it comes to functions. Including thus, the new “I like”, The famous Facebook stories, the ability to broadcast live videos and many more.

Battery consumption

Battery consumption

As well as the difference in weight between the normal Facebook application and the Lite version, there is also a dissimilarity between both apps Regarding the battery consumption generated in a mobile or Tablet. Except that, this is evidenced on a smaller scale.

Well, in terms of battery consumption that is observed when using the application through FB Lite, it is minimal because only decreases 1 by the way on an average timescale. On the contrary, the normal Facebook app can consume up to 3 percent of total applications used.

If you evaluate this in the first instance, it may not be that considerable. However, when you check it long term, the difference can be much more noticeable and substantial.

Is Facebook Lite really worth using if I have a mid-range smartphone?

Facebook Lite is really worth using if I have a mid-range smartphone

To classify a mobile as “mid-range”, The aspects to take into account are related to its processor, power, price, additives, quality of the material and other aspects. Which, in certain circumstances, can be limiting. Especially those who are based on your computer’s power and processor.

Well, before this, the question arises about the pre-existing need of users with a mid-range Smartphone, to use Lite versions of certain applications and the benefits that this can bring to your mobile.

In the case of the Facebook app, basically depends on user requirements. Since, although it is true, by using FB Lite you will be able to handle Facebook Messenger in little space, little memory used and little data wasted.

Which is an excellent benefit for those who own a modest phone that does not exhibit great power. So, if your mid-range phone cannot be classified as a powerful device, it is best that you make use of Facebook Lite.

However, if said mid-range Smartphone onwards can be located between mobiles with notable power And, in addition, it does not present problems of poor connection or performance, there is not much advantage around making use of the Lite version of Facebook. As well, you could download and install the normal app, because it will work perfectly on your device and, in addition, you will get more advanced features such as Facebook Live, posting stories on the social network, etc.

If you have any questions, leave them in the comments, we will answer you as soon as possible, and it will be of great help to more members of the community. Thank you! 😉

You may be interested:

Rate this post

Leave a Comment